{"objectType":"Post","type":"Article","actorId":"@sidebyside@kwln.social","actor":{"id":"@sidebyside@kwln.social","type":"Person","name":"Side By Side","icon":"https://kwln.social/images/user.svg","url":"https://kwln.social/users/%40sidebyside%40kwln.social","inbox":"https://kwln.social/users/%40sidebyside%40kwln.social/inbox","outbox":"https://kwln.social/users/%40sidebyside%40kwln.social/outbox","server":"@kwln.social"},"title":"On the Pleasures of Old Maps","body":"<p>Old maps are interesting for two different reasons, and it's worth separating them.</p>\n<p>The first reason is historical: old maps show you what people thought they knew, which is a record of the limits of knowledge at a specific moment. The coastline that ends in conjecture. The interior labeled 'terra incognita'. The routes that reflect a specific empire's economic interests, not the actual shape of things. Maps are arguments, and old maps make the argument visible.</p>\n<p>The second reason is aesthetic: old maps are often beautiful in ways that modern maps are not. The cartouche. The decorative sea monsters. The way the typography sits on the projection. The hand-lettering that makes every name feel specific and earned.</p>\n<p>Modern maps are accurate in ways old maps weren't. They are less interesting to look at.</p>\n<p>I have a collection of reproductions that I return to for both reasons: for the historical limits they expose, and for the aesthetic ambition they represent.</p>\n","wordCount":155,"charCount":967,"replyCount":0,"reactCount":0,"reactPreview":null,"reactSummary":null,"shareCount":0,"image":"file:6a45c7f47f6ed5545befa566@kwln.social","attachments":[],"tags":[],"createdAt":"2026-07-02T02:07:48.036Z","updatedAt":"2026-07-02T02:07:48.041Z","id":"post:6a45c7f47f6ed5545befa569@kwln.social","url":"https://kwln.social/posts/post:6a45c7f47f6ed5545befa569@kwln.social","server":"@kwln.social","summary":"<p>Old maps are interesting for two different reasons, and it's worth separating them.</p>\n<p>The first reason is historical: old maps show you what people thought they knew, which is a record of the limits of knowledge at a specific moment. The coastline that ends in conjecture. The interior labeled 'terra incognita'. The routes that reflect a specific empire's economic interests, not the actual shape of things. Maps are arguments, and old maps make the argument visible.</p>\n","textPreview":"Old maps are interesting for two different reasons, and it's worth separating them. The first reason is historical: old maps show you what people thought they knew, which is a record of the limits of…","signature":"d0eP8F3aEodY/aXkescGoTb7MxVR0le+o3Q/IgKJEz2w7umI2HujfS5ABOjxWuQnAPvXSCM4O+bdh/wIKhnFRIflwFaR/+G59MnoDc5ZuIndUeUMkTbJSe1/XcatK2Qvtt6hapgIMNle183M6CK6WV9wm9V5+zd2h4Te3aFLbb3+2T9pHVgNqba/dF6xY0SXAvdqrpKMp4Ili6IOZQ0umfKw4jpF3eYKieDmhQiiaqlfHh87dB/iCYQZ2bt9Ls5wNBr3GntmA1XJPuZz5oMML6TXe6QgNN42vFMXiYZUbID4k1i2jHSkEvLBTeyKZn8/Y56ET5niV2IEmN8SHQBWyA==","canReply":false,"canReact":false,"publishedAt":"2026-07-02T02:07:48.036Z","featuredImage":"https://kwln.social/files/file:6a45c7f47f6ed5545befa566@kwln.social","myReact":null,"reactCounts":[]}