{"objectType":"Post","type":"Article","actorId":"@handpress@kwln.social","actor":{"id":"@handpress@kwln.social","type":"Person","name":"Handpress","icon":"https://kwln.social/images/user.svg","url":"https://kwln.social/users/%40handpress%40kwln.social","inbox":"https://kwln.social/users/%40handpress%40kwln.social/inbox","outbox":"https://kwln.social/users/%40handpress%40kwln.social/outbox","server":"@kwln.social"},"title":"Why I Stopped Reading Reviews","body":"<p>At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle.</p>\n<p>The problem with reviews is not that they're often wrong (they are). The problem is that they're often right in ways that change the experience. To be told that a book's third act doesn't stick the landing is to read the third act waiting for the landing to not stick. The reviewer's failure becomes your expectation.</p>\n<p>There is an older model of criticism that tried to prepare you rather than evaluate for you. The review as map, not verdict. Here is the terrain; here is what you will find; here is how I went and what I brought back. Whether you should go was left to you.</p>\n<p>That model is mostly gone, replaced by the rating, the percentage, the stars out of five. The reduction of an experience to a score is a very modern form of criticism, and I think it does more harm than good.</p>\n<p>I still read criticism. But I read it afterward.</p>\n","wordCount":188,"charCount":1025,"replyCount":0,"reactCount":0,"reactPreview":null,"reactSummary":null,"shareCount":0,"attachments":[],"tags":[],"createdAt":"2026-07-02T02:04:36.290Z","updatedAt":"2026-07-02T02:04:36.295Z","id":"post:6a45c7347f6ed5545befa3f1@kwln.social","url":"https://kwln.social/posts/post:6a45c7347f6ed5545befa3f1@kwln.social","server":"@kwln.social","summary":"<p>At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle.</p>\n<p>The problem with reviews is not that they're often wrong (they are). The problem is that they're often right in ways that change the experience. To be told that a book's third act doesn't stick the landing is to read the third act waiting for the landing to not stick. The reviewer's failure becomes your expectation.</p>\n","textPreview":"At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle…","signature":"SxSViviK5eC7MxCKLUkfOY0oaC52Qo0JOc5gZ/bYZK9l+njb6PygaLv6gACsWYdFWAsaWcQhVNaOdSicO63nZ4Fx9FoxhrY88YvInueV09aESHfzD3xHD4OP2ejIidJzcOEz0AuzWIKmOkBp2YNnQGR0J3MQ3T4JgJ/QgtaZjNQKZhdQMSqHIdB+fmsFSCmbAQwMESZ0kb+5DeeFAe0B/hO+IgclIka8i8cGciqnvc8WjpHQuBeZL4ouAixl9wjvyMSMNBHT3zkCdFkwEwDdRfcWWhvCV9v3rHGH8JqxGJ/mzs7zTGdB0oTw+k8iP32FMGDNYgFThBL/RAEZMCSANw==","canReply":false,"canReact":false,"publishedAt":"2026-07-02T02:04:36.290Z","myReact":null,"reactCounts":[]}