{"objectType":"Post","type":"Article","actorId":"@newsprint@kwln.social","actor":{"id":"@newsprint@kwln.social","type":"Person","name":"Newsprint","icon":"https://kwln.social/images/user.svg","url":"https://kwln.social/users/%40newsprint%40kwln.social","inbox":"https://kwln.social/users/%40newsprint%40kwln.social/inbox","outbox":"https://kwln.social/users/%40newsprint%40kwln.social/outbox","server":"@kwln.social"},"title":"Why I Stopped Reading Reviews","body":"<p>At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle.</p>\n<p>The problem with reviews is not that they're often wrong (they are). The problem is that they're often right in ways that change the experience. To be told that a book's third act doesn't stick the landing is to read the third act waiting for the landing to not stick. The reviewer's failure becomes your expectation.</p>\n<p>There is an older model of criticism that tried to prepare you rather than evaluate for you. The review as map, not verdict. Here is the terrain; here is what you will find; here is how I went and what I brought back. Whether you should go was left to you.</p>\n<p>That model is mostly gone, replaced by the rating, the percentage, the stars out of five. The reduction of an experience to a score is a very modern form of criticism, and I think it does more harm than good.</p>\n<p>I still read criticism. But I read it afterward.</p>\n","wordCount":188,"charCount":1025,"replyCount":0,"reactCount":0,"reactPreview":null,"reactSummary":null,"shareCount":0,"attachments":[],"tags":[],"createdAt":"2026-07-02T02:03:57.116Z","updatedAt":"2026-07-02T02:03:57.121Z","id":"post:6a45c70d7f6ed5545befa3d0@kwln.social","url":"https://kwln.social/posts/post:6a45c70d7f6ed5545befa3d0@kwln.social","server":"@kwln.social","summary":"<p>At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle.</p>\n<p>The problem with reviews is not that they're often wrong (they are). The problem is that they're often right in ways that change the experience. To be told that a book's third act doesn't stick the landing is to read the third act waiting for the landing to not stick. The reviewer's failure becomes your expectation.</p>\n","textPreview":"At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle…","signature":"tr2kVaVLQo50kc3jRf8z0P8TakjBgHLOpKXnka71j9nmlccLtnunfuD60fX3//kKXzSByvVNArx9UkAWKEYDQC1GyPielkUkqb4h8U41l7q/3rDpO9SH5RH1Wv4zu6O3d0VhOQVH0pPUSkSW87wGSgYrTdpU6HKe3PeNEDLTr+GsB316v1YPng7ZWvnHvQn323WnI8p18CBafX+oVJDs6cytp+Mq1Z+8ClR7C4F0B7FoqZw/sgnFNAGwqqqgoDGIkHCjdYutc4H839EN0FmFuw3do3YCQj6INJBEKBIHMYwcYgXHE5boBHUFHfQBY8G0t6dtcZhqOU2z8BOAovP/ew==","canReply":false,"canReact":false,"publishedAt":"2026-07-02T02:03:57.116Z","myReact":null,"reactCounts":[]}