{"objectType":"Post","type":"Article","actorId":"@darkroom@kwln.social","actor":{"id":"@darkroom@kwln.social","type":"Person","name":"Dark Room","icon":"https://kwln.social/images/user.svg","url":"https://kwln.social/users/%40darkroom%40kwln.social","inbox":"https://kwln.social/users/%40darkroom%40kwln.social/inbox","outbox":"https://kwln.social/users/%40darkroom%40kwln.social/outbox","server":"@kwln.social"},"title":"Why I Stopped Reading Reviews","body":"<p>At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle.</p>\n<p>The problem with reviews is not that they're often wrong (they are). The problem is that they're often right in ways that change the experience. To be told that a book's third act doesn't stick the landing is to read the third act waiting for the landing to not stick. The reviewer's failure becomes your expectation.</p>\n<p>There is an older model of criticism that tried to prepare you rather than evaluate for you. The review as map, not verdict. Here is the terrain; here is what you will find; here is how I went and what I brought back. Whether you should go was left to you.</p>\n<p>That model is mostly gone, replaced by the rating, the percentage, the stars out of five. The reduction of an experience to a score is a very modern form of criticism, and I think it does more harm than good.</p>\n<p>I still read criticism. But I read it afterward.</p>\n","wordCount":188,"charCount":1025,"replyCount":0,"reactCount":0,"reactPreview":null,"reactSummary":null,"shareCount":0,"attachments":[],"tags":[],"createdAt":"2026-07-02T02:03:17.954Z","updatedAt":"2026-07-02T02:03:17.959Z","id":"post:6a45c6e57f6ed5545befa3af@kwln.social","url":"https://kwln.social/posts/post:6a45c6e57f6ed5545befa3af@kwln.social","server":"@kwln.social","summary":"<p>At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle.</p>\n<p>The problem with reviews is not that they're often wrong (they are). The problem is that they're often right in ways that change the experience. To be told that a book's third act doesn't stick the landing is to read the third act waiting for the landing to not stick. The reviewer's failure becomes your expectation.</p>\n","textPreview":"At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle…","signature":"VxdQbjgPBS6IgAC/0gXk2fkanBHZNfaLy7EP/DdhCmlIo748U69E7Im9obJpui1zIIZhUbBDrzjd0UKLKpeg3OeGcpZBriOxLAddDpWWyD25jUUeLwzFmGiljO9zqr1us82UVBQxDQVWS2BDg+1OXwfTVtOxhKrJloQGQkuJKdG2EkF6H9l1tKHodISlTC4KC7OFTRDCLm2zMEtrqg8QMBlQtkiDZRpsyuVfMcg2HApnbmBTMgCleagba3W31tBprD8IFmncptiQMdbvswAKjiMR+f4e4jpX/cejZnRQOASlIWYlvdkJv+vObdN0nNUsezbdsCvJMGFO/q6QVeHSVg==","canReply":false,"canReact":false,"publishedAt":"2026-07-02T02:03:17.954Z","myReact":null,"reactCounts":[]}