{"objectType":"Post","type":"Article","actorId":"@offgrid@kwln.social","actor":{"id":"@offgrid@kwln.social","type":"Person","name":"Off Grid","icon":"https://kwln.social/images/user.svg","url":"https://kwln.social/users/%40offgrid%40kwln.social","inbox":"https://kwln.social/users/%40offgrid%40kwln.social/inbox","outbox":"https://kwln.social/users/%40offgrid%40kwln.social/outbox","server":"@kwln.social"},"title":"Why I Stopped Reading Reviews","body":"<p>At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle.</p>\n<p>The problem with reviews is not that they're often wrong (they are). The problem is that they're often right in ways that change the experience. To be told that a book's third act doesn't stick the landing is to read the third act waiting for the landing to not stick. The reviewer's failure becomes your expectation.</p>\n<p>There is an older model of criticism that tried to prepare you rather than evaluate for you. The review as map, not verdict. Here is the terrain; here is what you will find; here is how I went and what I brought back. Whether you should go was left to you.</p>\n<p>That model is mostly gone, replaced by the rating, the percentage, the stars out of five. The reduction of an experience to a score is a very modern form of criticism, and I think it does more harm than good.</p>\n<p>I still read criticism. But I read it afterward.</p>\n","wordCount":188,"charCount":1025,"replyCount":0,"reactCount":0,"reactPreview":null,"reactSummary":null,"shareCount":0,"attachments":[],"tags":[],"createdAt":"2026-07-02T02:01:59.628Z","updatedAt":"2026-07-02T02:01:59.635Z","id":"post:6a45c6977f6ed5545befa36d@kwln.social","url":"https://kwln.social/posts/post:6a45c6977f6ed5545befa36d@kwln.social","server":"@kwln.social","summary":"<p>At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle.</p>\n<p>The problem with reviews is not that they're often wrong (they are). The problem is that they're often right in ways that change the experience. To be told that a book's third act doesn't stick the landing is to read the third act waiting for the landing to not stick. The reviewer's failure becomes your expectation.</p>\n","textPreview":"At some point in the last five years I stopped reading reviews of things I was planning to read, watch, or listen to. I did this gradually, then with intention, then as a matter of principle…","signature":"PQzrPZ5TsqutETgfl2hWN4kEHS1MQyzbTcpFgrmuAjJaxuQKsCWkiRqvIThnUYmS6dSG/Kz+swXn/WOg7S7c3MjgFvuq/z9Kymp/0v3Mq1a7twcawhej+wLzSDHgFG1xPZ7bjwaLiwfg08mareiBWQq/uLBJ2JKnlUMJcz3u0JGanYUe/dy8pvQUd60mRpnO0sm9jqMaAbnVrr9YOie27XpUwQMlI5eA2VIimkoKWCfqdcJ/SBehfS3IwBA+/uHLLEeEuL4DDj0O51llH++tXjo9rLx1JAZ9OB+iuFnrdkdXt9Qbtr0uBN6RXzpgJoQ2rZogpRPgHaFDDoU/8fvz8Q==","canReply":false,"canReact":false,"publishedAt":"2026-07-02T02:01:59.628Z","myReact":null,"reactCounts":[]}